/ EN
2026-08-02 00:00 Papers Foundations & Methods Translated from EN

CORTIVA Hits 73.5% Top-1 in EEG-to-Image Retrieval

Summary CORTIVA, a candidate-score fusion framework for EEG- and MEG-to-image retrieval, reached 73.5% Top-1 and 95.3% Top-5 accuracy across ten participants on the 200-way THINGS-EEG2 benchmark, beating the strongest reported baseline by 10.3 and 5.4 percentage points. Instead of compressing heterogeneous visual supervision into a single embedding before ranking, the authors let separate decoding routes align to different visual targets and score the same candidate pool independently, merging only the temperature-scaled score vectors, which they say preserves complementary evidence; with a modality-specific encoder the same approach reached 42.4% Top-1 on THINGS-MEG. The work is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed.
Why it matters The gain comes from where the fusion happens rather than from a bigger model, which suggests the ceiling on EEG-to-image retrieval is partly a ranking-architecture problem, and it is cheap enough for other groups to test before peer review settles the claim.

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — A candidate-score fusion framework called CORTIVA lifted Top-1 accuracy in EEG-to-image retrieval to 73.5%, according to a preprint posted to arXiv on August 2, 2026. The authors say most existing systems collapse heterogeneous visual supervision into a single embedding before ranking, imposing one similarity geometry on every candidate order. CORTIVA instead aligns three decoding routes to heterogeneous visual targets, scores the same indexed candidates independently, and combines only their temperature-scaled score vectors before ranking, preserving complementary evidence.

On the 200-way THINGS-EEG2 benchmark, the framework reaches 73.5% Top-1 and 95.3% Top-5 across ten participants. With a modality-specific neural encoder, the same fusion principle reaches 42.4% Top-1 on THINGS-MEG. The authors add that matched route-removal retraining and four weight controls indicate the gain arises from integrating complementary route scores and persists with uniform weighting, without requiring a specialized weighting rule. The work is a preprint and has not yet been peer reviewed.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1
arxiv.org 2026-08-02
Read original ↗
Suggest a correction Revisions · none / EN
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About