中 / EN
2026-10-27 00:00 Papers Foundations & Methods Source language EN

Kocaeli Collaboration Reports 95.6% Four-Class fNIRS Accuracy on a 29-Participant Dataset

Summary Researchers from Kocaeli University and collaborating institutions proposed an adaptive multi-domain feature-fusion framework to distinguish left-hand motor imagery, right-hand motor imagery, mental arithmetic and rest from functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals. Using subject-independent leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on an open-access dataset of 29 participants, the framework achieved 95.6% mean accuracy, compared with 90.7% for temporal features alone, 95.0% for cepstral features alone and 95.2% for direct concatenation. Accuracy gains over direct concatenation ranged from 0.2 to 0.7 percentage points for every participant. Most of the gain over temporal features came from the cepstral domain, with adaptive weighting adding a small, consistent improvement.
Why it matters The study separates the contribution of adding another feature domain from that of adaptive weighting. Cepstral features account for most of the gain, rather than the weighting mechanism delivering a large improvement on its own.

科贾埃利大学等合作提升近红外脑机接口四分类表现
Image: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), CC BY 4.0

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — A collaboration involving Kocaeli University, Türkiye, reported a four-class fNIRS BCI study in Sensors on October 27, 2026. Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on a public dataset of 29 participants distinguished left- and right-hand motor imagery, mental arithmetic and rest, achieving 95.6% mean accuracy.

The framework combines six temporal hemodynamic descriptors with ten fNIRS-adapted Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), capturing different aspects of the hemodynamic response. It learns sample-dependent weights for the two feature domains before classification with a multilayer perceptron, rather than simply concatenating the features.

Evaluation used an open-access dataset of 29 participants performing left-hand motor imagery, right-hand motor imagery, mental arithmetic and rest. Subject-independent leave-one-subject-out cross-validation held out each participant's data for testing in turn. AMFF achieved a mean accuracy of 95.6%, with precision, recall and F1-score of 94.6%, 95.9% and 95.3%, respectively.

Accuracy was 90.7% for temporal-only features, 95.0% for cepstral-only features and 95.2% for direct concatenation. Friedman and Holm-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed significant differences for all four metrics. AMFF exceeded static concatenation for every participant, although accuracy gains were small, ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 percentage points.

The study notes that most of the improvement over temporal descriptors came from the cepstral domain, while adaptive weighting added a small but consistent refinement. MFCC parameter-sensitivity, coefficient-ablation and descriptor-ablation analyses further examined each domain's contribution. These findings come from cross-validation on a public dataset and do not establish performance in real-time BCI deployment.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1
Read original ↗
Suggest a correction Revisions · none 中 / EN
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About