/ EN
2026-09-08 00:00 Belgium Papers Foundations & Methods Translated from EN

KU Leuven Team Finds EEG Tracking of Moving Objects Weakens Farther From the Gaze Point

Summary Even when the eyes stay fixed on one point, the brain tracks moving objects in a video, and that tracking grows stronger with attention. But researchers at KU Leuven found that EEG tracking of an object's motion weakens the farther the object sits from the fixation point, meaning decoding methods that read attention from tracking strength may mistake where an object is for where attention is.
Why it matters Visual attention decoding is an emerging BCI approach built on the assumption that stronger coupling between brain signals and object motion means more attention; with eye-movement artifacts controlled, this study shows coupling also drops with distance from the fixation point, so coupling strength carries a positional confound that attention-decoding researchers will need to correct for.

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — Reading which object a person is attending to from EEG signals is a newer direction in brain-computer interface research, but researchers at KU Leuven have identified a previously underappreciated confound: the farther an object sits from the fixation point, the weaker the brain’s neural tracking of its motion. The results were reported in Journal of Neural Engineering on September 8, 2026.

Participants watched natural videos while maintaining gaze fixation, and EEG signals were recorded across three tasks that manipulated object eccentricity — the distance between a visual object and the fixation point — and attention conditions. The team used correlation analysis and match-mismatch decoding to quantify neural tracking of object motion.

The analysis supports three conclusions: neural tracking of object motion in natural videos works under gaze fixation; the strength of that tracking is modulated by attention; and there is a significant eccentricity confound in the EEG responses, with poorer neural tracking of motion at larger eccentricities.

The researchers say the findings indicate that results from previous free-viewing studies reflect genuine neural processing rather than mere oculomotor artifacts. But the eccentricity effect also highlights a major limitation for current decoding approaches, which assume coupling strength reflects attention levels alone.

The authors are Yao Y, Salamanca González C, Geirnaert S, Gillebert CR, Tuytelaars T and Bertrand A, affiliated with the KU Leuven STADIUS Center for dynamic systems signal processing and data analysis, KU Leuven Brain and Cognition, and KU Leuven Processing Speech And Images. The DOI is 10.1088/1741-2552/aea449 and the PubMed ID is 42710532.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1
Read original ↗
Suggest a correction Revisions · none / EN
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About