中 / EN
2026-10-11 00:00 Papers Foundations & Methods Source language EN

EEG Transform Reduces Cross-Session Identity Recognition at a Cost to Motor Imagery Decoding

Summary Researchers developed an EEG transform that requires no trained privacy model to reduce features linking recordings from the same person across sessions. Tests on two public datasets used five attackers spanning four covariance-space representations. The strongest attacker's accuracy fell from 90.8% to 15.6% on BCI Competition IV-2a and from 90.8% to 9.9% on OpenBMI. Relative to the 8-30 Hz input, motor imagery decoding accuracy decreased by 7.0 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively. The transform was fitted on one session and applied unchanged to a held-out later session. This study is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed.
Why it matters The study tests whether privacy processing fitted on one recording session carries over to a later session, rather than only working within the same batch of data. Ablation tests also isolate the main contributors: mean alignment and scatter whitening.

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — According to arXiv, Sheikh Samit Muhaimin and Aarthy Nagarajan uploaded a preprint on October 11, 2026, examining EEG privacy in motor imagery brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). The preprint has not been peer reviewed. It addresses cross-session identity leakage: electroencephalography (EEG) retains person-identifying structure across recording sessions, potentially allowing separately released recordings from the same person to be linked.

The researchers introduce a Riemannian transform that operates directly on covariance representations used in motor imagery pipelines, which describe how signals vary together. It equalizes two subject-conditioned geometric statistics: the Riemannian mean covariance and the tangent-space scatter around that mean. Two optional band-specific refinements are also included. The transform requires no learned privacy model, surrogate network, or gradient-based training. It is fitted on one session and applied unchanged to a held-out later session. Ablation tests show that mean alignment and scatter whitening account for nearly all of the suppression, while the optional steps add small, dataset-dependent refinements.

Tests covered two public datasets and five attackers spanning four covariance-space representations. The strongest attacker's accuracy fell from 90.8% to 15.6% on BCI Competition IV-2a and from 90.8% to 9.9% on OpenBMI. Compared with the 8-30 Hz input, motor imagery (MI) decoding accuracy decreased by 7.0 and 2.1 percentage points, respectively. At every tested batch size, no aggregation rule exceeded chance-level identification accuracy by more than two percentage points. These findings describe a trade-off between identity suppression and decoding performance on public datasets, not the elimination of all identity leakage risks.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1
arxiv.org 2026-10-11
Read original ↗
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About