/ EN
2026-09-15 00:00 United States Papers Foundations & Methods Translated from EN

Adding fNIRS to EEG Fails to Improve Brain-Controlled Stimulation in 16-Person Trial

Summary Combining EEG with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) did not make brain-controlled electrical stimulation more accurate in a blinded randomized trial of 16 healthy volunteers. The hybrid and EEG-only groups showed no statistically significant differences in real-time three-class recall, sense of agency, attention or physical comfort; median recall was 53.5% in the hybrid group and 57.3% with EEG alone. The researchers also released the full EEG-fNIRS dataset.
Why it matters BCI-driven functional electrical stimulation (FES) is seen as one of the more promising routes in post-stroke rehabilitation, but adding fNIRS means more sensors, longer setup and higher cost. This trial tested the add-on head to head and found no difference, a check on the intuition that more signals mean better control; the public dataset lets other groups rerun the analysis. With only 16 healthy volunteers, the result cannot be extended directly to patients.

混合脑电与近红外并未提升脑控电刺激表现,16人随机试验显示两组无差异
Image: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), CC BY 4.0

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — Fusing EEG with functional near-infrared spectroscopy gave no better real-time three-class control of wrist extensor functional electrical stimulation than EEG alone in 16 healthy volunteers. In a blind randomized trial reported in Sensors on September 15, 2026, researchers at Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University and collaborating institutions found median real-time three-class recall of 53.5% in the hybrid group and 57.3% in the EEG-only group, with no statistically significant between-group differences in classification accuracy, sense of agency, attention or physical comfort (p > 0.05).

The 16 volunteers completed five BCI-FES training sessions over three days. In one group, electrical stimulation of the wrist extensor muscles was driven by a hybrid EEG-fNIRS classifier; in the other, by EEG alone. Median agency scores reached roughly 75% of the maximum possible value in both groups. Simulation analysis showed comparable accuracy for fNIRS-only and EEG-only classifiers.

For channel selection, a genetic algorithm identified C3 and C4 as the most informative EEG channels, while optimal fNIRS placement required individual optimization rather than a single fixed montage. Within the constraints of the classification and fusion pipeline used, the team concluded that signal acquisition modality did not significantly influence BCI-FES performance or sense of agency in healthy subjects.

The complete EEG-fNIRS dataset is publicly available through NITRC. The authors describe the work as a preliminary step toward optimizing such systems for clinical use, and note that the participants were healthy, leaving open whether the findings extend to post-stroke rehabilitation patients.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1

Central Michigan University timeline

2026-07 Only 11 pediatric BCI trials worldwide, children may be underrepresented All entries →
Read original ↗
Suggest a correction Revisions · none / EN
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About