Theoretical and Natural Science

A brain-computer interface can read neural activity tied to movement, while a powered exoskeleton supplies the force needed to carry it out. But EEG is noisy, muscle signals shift with fatigue and recovery, and the right level of assistance depends heavily on the user and the task, so AI's main value lies in handling several changing signals at once rather than relying on a single fixed input. The review surveys how EEG, EMG and mechanical sensing are combined for exoskeleton control and contrasts two applications with very different goals: stroke rehabilitation and healthy users. The author argues that higher classification accuracy alone is not enough, since latency, calibration, fatigue, uncertainty and physical safety also determine whether a system is truly usable.

A systematic review of BCI medical applications published on August 17, 2026 in Theoretical and Natural Science covers literature review, comparative case analysis of invasive vs non-invasive techniques, and interdisciplinary assessment. It reports that invasive BCIs reach 80% to 100% task success rates in robotic arm control but are limited by surgical hazards, progressive signal deterioration and costs above $250,000, while non-invasive BCIs are safer and more widely deployed in community neurorehabilitation with about 70% effectiveness for post-stroke upper-limb recovery, yet suffer poor signal-to-noise ratios, a BCI illiteracy rate near 30% and low information transfer speeds. The review also addresses neural data privacy, autonomy paradoxes and inequitable access.