/ EN

Scientific Data

4 entries
September 2026

NETBCI Dataset Pairs MEG and EEG from 19 Users across Four BCI Training Sessions

A team in France and the United States has released NETBCI, a longitudinal multimodal dataset pairing magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) from 19 healthy subjects across 4 sessions performed on 4 different days, built to study how brain networks reorganize during brain-computer interface training. Controlling a BCI remains a learned skill that a non-negligible proportion of users never acquire even after several sessions, the authors write, and the causes of that inter-individual variability remain an open question. Each session comprises 2 eyes-open resting-state recordings of 3 minutes each plus 6 runs in which participants either sustained right-hand motor imagery or stayed at rest to control the position of a virtual cursor, and the release also includes anonymized MRI scans and behavioral scores; the authors say they hope the sample size and range of modalities will support analyses beyond brain network reorganization.
August 2026

Air Force Medical University Releases Multi-Day fNIRS Stroop Dataset from 55 Adults

Researchers at Air Force Medical University have published a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) dataset in Scientific Data: frontal hemoglobin responses from 55 young adults, each recorded across three color-word Stroop sessions spread over about two weeks, with more than 30 trials per condition. The authors offer it for work on conflict inhibition, for building decoders for neurofeedback training, and for training large-scale cross-subject fNIRS models.
July 2026

A Multi-Paradigm Longitudinal EEG Dataset Including 'Sixth-Finger' and 'Affected-Hand' Motor Imagery of Stroke Patients

Researchers released a multi-paradigm longitudinal EEG dataset from 24 stroke patients, covering a novel 'sixth-finger' motor imagery paradigm and affected-hand motor imagery. The dataset spans the full pre-training, post-training and follow-up stages and includes raw EEG, preprocessed data and patient clinical information. Preliminary analysis with classical classifiers (CSP+SVM, CSP+LDA) kept average cross-paradigm classification accuracy at roughly 85%–86%.
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About