/ EN
2026-08-25 00:00 CanadaSouth Korea Papers Foundations & Methods Translated from EN

Wireless EEG Use Climbs in Children With Developmental Disabilities, BCI at 28.1%

Summary Researchers at Yonsei University in South Korea and the University of Toronto reviewed 64 studies covering 3,103 participants and found wireless EEG increasingly used in research on children with developmental disabilities, with brain-computer interfaces accounting for 28.1% of the included studies. BCI work favored low-channel, dry-electrode, consumer-grade devices, while biomarker-driven studies used higher channel counts and signal fidelity; reporting on data quality was thin, with 85.9% of studies giving no validation against wired EEG and 79.7% not specifying impedance thresholds. Published August 25, 2026 in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, it is the first scoping review to map wireless EEG use across a broad spectrum of developmental disabilities in children.
Why it matters The number that matters here is 85.9%, not 28.1%: most wireless EEG work in this population has never been checked against wired recording, so the pediatric BCI literature carries less weight than its volume suggests, and anyone building on it inherits an unquantified device-validation gap.

无线脑电图在发育障碍儿童研究中应用增多,脑机接口占28.1%
Image: Journal of medical Internet research, CC BY

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — Wireless electroencephalography (EEG) use in research on children with developmental disabilities is on the rise, with brain-computer interface (BCI) technology accounting for 28.1% of included studies, according to a scoping review published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research on August 25, 2026, by researchers from Yonsei University and the University of Toronto.

The review searched 7 databases from inception through December 2025, identifying 64 studies with 3103 participants published between 2005 and 2025, showing an increasing trend in both publications and sample sizes. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (59.4%) and autism spectrum disorder (31.3%) were the most frequently studied conditions. Primary application domains were biomarker-driven assessment and diagnosis (51.6%), BCI technology (28.1%), intervention evaluation (12.5%), and task or state monitoring (7.8%).

Consumer-grade devices predominated (47.7%), followed by research-use-only (29.2%) and medical devices (23.1%). BCI studies favored low-channel, dry-electrode, consumer-grade devices, whereas biomarker-driven and intervention studies used higher channel counts and greater signal fidelity.

Data quality-related reporting was substantially incomplete: 85.9% of studies did not report validation against a wired EEG system, 79.7% did not specify impedance thresholds, and 12.5% described no artifact handling. The authors recommend that future studies prioritize rigorous validation within developmental disability cohorts and develop population-specific guidelines for device selection, signal quality assurance, and reporting transparency.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1

From these organizations

2026-07 University of Toronto Diffusion Latents Boost Neural Speech Decoding
Read original ↗
Suggest a correction Revisions · none / EN
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About