/ EN
2026-08-26 00:00 United States Papers Foundations & Methods Translated from EN

BCI Society Workshop Tackles Outcome Measures for Pivotal Trials

Summary A workshop at the BCI Society Meeting 2025, run with the Implantable BCI Collaborative Community (iBCI-CC), took up how clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for pivotal BCI trials should be selected, developed and validated. Participants pointed to patient heterogeneity, the absence of widely validated COAs, and the difficulty of capturing outcomes that matter in home and daily-life settings. The discussion lays groundwork for the iBCI-CC Clinical Study Endpoints Workgroup to build a transparent process for identifying meaningful aspects of health and concepts of interest, in support of regulatory approval and reimbursement.
Why it matters This is the first iBCI-CC-led push to standardize outcome assessment for pivotal trials, and endpoints rather than decoding accuracy are what regulators and payers will price, which makes a workgroup writing that definition down the least glamorous and most load-bearing step between today's feasibility studies and a reimbursed product.

BCIwiki (bciwiki.com) — Choosing the right outcome measures for brain-computer interface (BCI) clinical trials is becoming a key step toward regulatory approval and reimbursement. The BCI Society Meeting 2025 held a workshop in collaboration with the Implantable BCI Collaborative Community (iBCI-CC) to discuss the selection, development and validation of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) for pivotal studies of BCIs, summarized in the Journal of Neural Engineering on August 26, 2026.

The workshop centered on challenges such as patient heterogeneity, the lack of widely validated and fit-for-purpose COAs, and the need to capture meaningful outcomes in home and daily-life environments. Participants noted that trials like ADAPT-PD underscore the value of capturing device performance in home and daily-life settings, highlighting the need for context-sensitive and flexible metrics that reflect patient priorities. The workshop lays a foundation for the iBCI-CC Clinical Study Endpoints Workgroup to establish a transparent process for identifying meaningful aspects of health (MAHs) and concepts of interest (COIs) that are suitable for specific iBCI technologies, patient-informed, and conducive to regulatory approval and reimbursement.

Compiled by BCIwiki from public sources

Sources · 1

From these organizations

2026-09 Carnegie Mellon University Synchron Stent Electrode Beats Scalp EEG per Channel in One ALS Patient 2026-09 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 4,096-Channel μECoG Array Maps Brain Function During Surgery With 91.3% Channel Yield 2026-09 Paradromics Paradromics Implant Lets First Participant Speak Her Own Words in Real Time 2026-09 Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon Team Strips ECG Noise From Stentrode, Keeps Motor Signals
Read original ↗
Suggest a correction Revisions · none / EN
© 2026 BCIwiki.com Digest Topics Tips Subscribe Revisions About