A perspective review published in Computers in biology and medicine examines EEG non-stationarity across sessions, people, and recording conditions. It asks whether mechanisms that help the brain maintain functional stability can improve the robustness of brain-computer interface models. The review covers synaptic plasticity, homeostatic regulation, neural oscillations, and spiking representations, comparing bio-inspired approaches with conventional machine learning and transfer learning. It also considers hybrid designs that combine biologically grounded mechanisms with artificial neural networks. The author proposes operational definitions for bio-inspired, bio-plausible, and bio-realistic modeling, together with a minimum specification for continual EEG benchmarks. Because direct EEG evidence remains limited for several proposed mechanisms, the review stresses the need to distinguish empirical findings from hypotheses and future research directions.